Donald Trump’s efforts to push polluting coal onto Americans appear to be failing, as more households opt for rooftop solar.
Why it matters: Political noise won't stop the LCOE advantage of solar; expect US demand to keep Tier 1 inverter supply tight regardless of election rhetoric.
Stop reading the political tea leaves and start looking at the balance sheets. The narrative that a second Trump term—or the ghost of his first—is a death knell for solar is a lazy take for people who don't understand the 'duck curve.' Whether it's the US or the EU, the move toward distributed energy isn't an ideological hobby anymore; it is a structural hedge against grid volatility and rising retail electricity prices.
The Physics of Marginal Cost
In the US, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is effectively baked into the economy. You have 'Red' states like Texas and Florida leading in solar capacity because the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of solar simply beats coal into the dirt. For a developer in Essen or a residential installer in Utrecht, this is the blueprint: When politicians try to revive coal, they aren't fighting activists; they're fighting the physics of marginal cost. Coal plants have fuel costs and massive O&M; solar has a sun that doesn't send an invoice.
The Supply Chain Ripple
Here is the specific European reality: If the US rooftop market continues to defy political gravity, the pressure on Tier 1 supply chains remains high. We saw what happened in 2022—supply constraints don't care about your local subsidies if Enphase or SolarEdge are diverted to higher-margin US projects protected by Section 201/301 tariffs. A 'failed war on renewables' in the States means your lead times for high-end microinverters aren't going to collapse anytime soon.
We are actually in a sweet spot. We get the tech faster and cheaper because we aren't fighting a trade war with our own energy transition. Don't fear the rhetoric from across the pond; fear the day solar becomes a partisan culture war in Brussels the way it did in D.C. As long as it stays an economic argument, the installer wins.