Compare Flick AI and Kommo (formerly amoCRM). Autonomous AI agent, WhatsApp, pricing model, contract terms, and industry features.
| FEATURE | FLICK AI | KOMMO |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomous AI seller | Built-in, every plan | AI agents on top plans + credits |
| AI guardrails (how far AI can go) | Per-stage AI ceiling | Script-based bots |
| Contract | Monthly, cancel anytime | 6-month minimum |
| Pricing model | Per workspace, free plan | $15–45 per user/mo |
| Solar proposals + panel layout | AI-generated | Not available |
| Online booking (salons, services) | Built-in + AI books clients | Via integrations |
| Setup | 48h, personal manager | Self-serve / partners |
| Starting price | Free plan · paid from €29/mo | $15/user/mo × 6 months upfront |
Kommo added AI agents on top of a classic CRM — they answer and book, but live on the higher plans with credit packs, per user, with a 6-month minimum contract. Flick AI was built AI-first: the autonomous seller is the core of every plan.
Flick gives you explicit control over how far the AI can move a deal (per-stage AI ceiling). With bot builders you either trust the script or turn it off.
Vertical depth: solar proposals with automatic panel layout, salon booking, tour inventory — Kommo stays a generic pipeline.